I will be putting information about the morphology classification here.

So far, only Bianca has classified all the galaxies. However, I am putting a preliminary analysis here to start having an idea of how its going, while we all finish classifying...

Below, you can find a few relevant numbers and plots.



====== A2192 ======

__In numbers:__

> A total of 1269 galaxies were classified
> From those, only 377 have redhshifts (I call this the "z-sample")
> 99 (26%) in the z-sample had no-redshift (z=99.99)
> 74 (20%) in the z-sample had no-morphology (mor = 5 or 6)
> 41 (11%) in the z-sample had no-redshift and no-morphology
> 79 (21%) in the z-sample were early-type galaxies (mor = 1 or 2)
> 221 (59%)in the z-sample were late-type galaxies (mor = 3 or 4)

__In Figures:__


**1. Distribution of all morphologies (1=E, 2=S0, 3=S, 4=Irr, 5=Unclassifiable, 6=Nothing):**

{{budhies:optical:A2192_mor_hist_all.png?400}}



**2. A CMD with early-types (red) and late types (blue) inside the most prominent z-peak of A2192 (z-limits chosen by eye):**


{{budhies:optical:A2192_mor_CMD.png?400}}

**3. A couple of 3D plot of the distrubution (ra-dec-z) of the targeted galaxies pus those that had literature-z in A2192** 

The 2 plots are the same thing, just different views!

Red = early-type galaxies (E + S0)

Blue = late-type galaxies (S + Irr)


{{budhies:optical:A2192_mor_3D_f.png}}

{{budhies:optical:A2192_mor_3D_g.png}}

====== A963 ======

A couple of 3D plots for A963 with morphological information (only Bianca's classification), now that all the redshifts are ready...

{{budhies:optical:A963_3D_1.png}}

{{budhies:optical:A963_3D_2.png}}

{{budhies:optical:A963_3D_3.png}}