1.
INFRASTRUCTURE COOPERATION NETWORK IN RADIO ASTRONOMY
2.
MANAGING THE NETWORK
2.1
Scope and membership
Scope
The Network in Radio Astronomy will provide a forum for the
exchange of information amongst infrastructures forming the European VLBI
Network (EVN) and between the EVN and its user community, as well as to monitor
progress in the initiatives leading to future large scale facilities in radio
astronomy. The specific objectives of the Network are three-fold: i) to enhance
the quality and quantity of the access provided to users of the European VLBI
Network, a European-wide distributed facility; ii) to coordinate input on the
scientific imperatives and technical requirements for the Atacama Large
Millimetre Array from the wider astronomical community in Europe as part of the
ongoing design and development phase of this project, and iii) to map out
collaborations leading to a formal proposal for the construction of the Square
Kilometre Array.
The research infrastructures that will take part in the Infrastructure
Cooperation Network are institutes owning and operating radio telescopes in the
European VLBI Network (see Table 1), radio astronomy institutes in Europe
actively involved in studies leading to the new generation facility, ALMA
(Table 2), and radio astronomy institutes in Europe, Australia and Canada which
are actively involved in studies leading to the new generation facility, SKA
(Table 3). A total of eleven institutes
in the European Union are involved, one in Poland, and two outside Europe.
Representatives
at the Network meetings:
-
Directors of the member radio
telescopes of the EVN
-
Directors of radio astronomy institutes
in Europe, Australia and Canada involved in preparations for future facilities
-
Representatives of users of the EVN in
western and eastern Europe
-
Representatives of the Programme
Management in DGXII
-
One representative from the European
Astronomical Society
There are no legal links between the partners in the
Network. A number of the EVN institutes contribute to the operating costs of
the EVN=s
central institute, JIVE.
Table
1: Participating institutes in the European VLBI Network
|
Institute of Radio
Astronomy (IRA) |
Bologna, Italy |
|
Joint Institute for
VLBI in Europe (JIVE) |
Dwingeloo, The
Netherlands |
|
Max-Planck-Institute
for Radioastronomy (MPIfR) |
Bonn, Germany |
|
Metsähovi Radio
Observatory (MRO) |
Espoo, Finland |
|
Paris Observatory
(Obs Paris) |
Paris, France |
|
National
Astronomical Observatory (OAN)) |
Alcala, Spain |
|
Netherlands
Foundation for Research in Astronomy (ASTRON) |
Dwingeloo, The
Netherlands |
|
Jodrell Bank
Observatory (JBO) |
Jodrell Bank, UK |
|
Onsala Space
Observatory (OSO) |
Onsala, Sweden |
|
Torun Centre for
Astronomy (TCA) |
Torun, Poland |
Table
2: Participating institutes in the Atacama Large Millimetre Array project
|
Bordeaux
Observatory (ObsBordeaux) |
Bordeaux, France |
|
Institute of Radio
Astronomy (IRA) |
Bologna, Italy |
|
Institute for
Millimeter Radio Astronomy (IRAM) |
Grenoble, France |
|
Max-Planck-Institute
for Radioastronomy (MPIfR) |
Bonn, Germany |
|
National
Astronomical Observatory (OAN) |
Alcala, Spain |
|
Netherlands
Foundation for Research in Astronomy (ASTRON) |
Dwingeloo, The
Netherlands |
|
Jodrell Bank
Observatory (JBO) |
Jodrell Bank, UK |
|
Onsala Space
Observatory (OSO) |
Onsala, Sweden |
Table
3: Participating institutes in the Square Kilometre Array project
|
Institute of Radio
Astronomy (IRA) |
Bologna, Italy |
|
Joint Institute for
VLBI in Europe (JIVE) |
Dwingeloo, The
Netherlands |
|
Max-Planck-Institute
for Radioastronomy (MPIfR) |
Bonn, Germany |
|
Paris Observatory
(Obs Paris) |
Paris, France |
|
National
Astronomical Observatory (OAN) |
Alcala, Spain |
|
Netherlands
Foundation for Research in Astronomy (ASTRON) |
Dwingeloo, The
Netherlands |
|
Jodrell Bank
Observatory (JBO) |
Jodrell Bank, UK |
|
Onsala Space Observatory
(OSO) |
Onsala, Sweden |
|
Torun Centre for
Astronomy (TCA) |
Torun, Poland |
|
Australia Telescope
National Facility (ATNF) |
Sydney, NSW,
Australia |
|
Herzberg Institute
for Astrophysics (HIA) |
Victoria, BC,
Canada |
The Australia
Telescope National Facility (ATNF) is the national radio astronomy facility and
is conducting an active research programme on a number of the potential new
technologies which could serve as the basis for the SKA. The Herzberg Institute
of Astrophysics in Canada coordinates the technical research and development
activities for the SKA in Canada, in particular on antenna concepts. Both
institutes are major players in radio astronomy globally, and coordinate
development work on SKA by other institutes and research organizations in their
own countries. The European radio
astronomy community will benefit substantially from close coordination with
these institutes on the technical and management issues related to the SKA. US
radio astronomy institutes have recently formed an informal consortium to
coordinate their activities, and the European astronomical community will
benefit from close coordination with the US. Representation from the key
institutes in India and China at the discussions will be invited on a
case-by-case basis.
The European Astronomical Society representative will help
facilitate a `Round
Table on Astronomy’
which is planned to take place once per year at the Annual General Meeting of
the European Astronomical Society between this Infrastructure Cooperation
Network in Radio Astronomy and OPTICON in Optical/Infra-red Astronomy.
2.2
Organisation
The General Meetings of the Network will be organized once
per year in conjunction with one of the regular meetings of the Board of
Directors of the European Consortium for VLBI. The VLBI Consortium itself meets
twice a year at a member institute on a rotating basis. As is current practice
with meetings of the VLBI Consortium, the date and location of the General
Meeting of the Infrastructure Cooperation Network will be set 6 months in
advance, and invitations issued to participants including the Programme
Management in DGXII. The agenda and working papers will be circulated at least
two weeks in advance of the meeting. Minutes of the General Meeting will be
made and circulated to all participants within one month, as is now the case
with the minutes of the VLBI Consortium meetings.
Typical
Agenda for a General Meeting of the Network
1. Approval of the agenda
2. Approval of the minutes of the previous Network General
Meeting
3. Review of action items arising from the previous meeting
4.
Activity reports from the European VLBI Network, the Atacama Large Millimetre
Array, and the Square Kilometre Array
5.
Reports on the joint scientific/technological activities and studies of the Cooperation
Network and other EC-supported activities
6. Information on EC programmes of interest to Network
participants by DGXII Programme Management
7.
Information of interest to the Network participants by the European
Astronomical Society representative
8. Opinions and suggestions of the EVN user representatives
9. New action item
10. Any other business
11. Date and venue of the next Network General Meeting
A new Web page for the Infrastructure Cooperation Network
will reside on the EVN site and contain pointers to the Web pages for the EVN,
ALMA and SKA. A regular report will be written for the Newsletter of the
European Astronomical Society which receives wide circulation in Europe.
3.
JOINT SCIENTIFIC/TECHNOLOGICAL ACTIVITIES AND STUDIES
3.1
Sustained reliable operation of the European VLBI Network
3.1.1
Work Plan
3.1.1.1
Main tasks
|
Technical objective |
Work to be done |
Partners |
|
achieve sustained
reliable operation with the EVN |
1) Organize workshops on operational
practices, optimum maintenance, automated systems 2) implement changes at the radio
telescopes 3) carry out
observations with high reliability |
See Table 1 in section 1.1 Coordinator: JIVE |
Each partner will contribute 2 person months to
participation in the Workshops, 4 person months to implementing the changes at
the individual telescopes, and 24 person months of permanent staff effort to carrying
out the observations.
The major project milestones and deliverables are shown in
the accompanying chart at the end of the Project Programme.
3.1.1.2 Technical objectives
a) The deliverables at the end of the contract period will
be:
i) improved inter-operability of the radio telescopes in the
EVN measured in terms of sustained reliable operation, with the percentage of
observing hours lost due to equipment and operational failures being less than
10%.
ii) frequency agile operation
iii) automated calibration and flagging of data
b) The coordination afforded by the Cooperation Network will
lead to operational practices being adopted by the EVN which result in higher
performance, as well as more flexible instrumentation being available for the
study of variable radio sources.
c) All users of the EVN facilities, both within the
Cooperation Network and outside, will benefit from the results. Deliverables i)
and iii) will be directly visible to the users in terms of the quantity and
quality of the data produced by the EVN. Deliverable ii) will benefit those
users doing research into variable galactic and extragalactic radio sources.
All three deliverables improve the operational efficiency for the
infrastructure operators participating in the EVN.
d) The Network policy on coordination and complementarity is
that all radio telescopes in the EVN should adopt the same or similar
operational practices during EVN observing sessions. In addition, all radio
telescopes should strive to implement frequency agile receiver systems with the
same or similar characteristic switching timescales.
e) The new procedures and capabilities developed for the EVN
will be announced in the thrice-yearly Call for Proposals and at the
appropriate seminars and VLBI schools. As is traditional in the radio astronomy
field, new technical and astronomical results will be published in the open
literature.
f) There are no obvious risks which will hinder the
exploitation of the results once available.
3.1.1.3 Potential benefits
All partners in the activity are infrastructure operators
who will benefit from the expected results by reducing downtime during
observing sessions to a minimum. Implementation of frequency agility will
reduce the time to change frequency from the traditional few hours at many
stations down to one minute, which has obvious operational benefits to the
infrastructure operators. Both aspects provide additional attraction for users
to propose observations on the EVN.
The EVN is already a working example of a distributed
infrastructure.
3.1.2
Organisation
The activity will be organised through the EVN Technical and
Operations Group (TOG). The TOG is responsible for technical developments and
operations in the EVN with members from each of the radio observatories. A plan
of action for each of the segments of the activity will be produced as a result
of the Workshops, and standard management techniques and software such as
Superproject will be employed, where appropriate, to monitor progress in
relation to the milestones.
Excellent communication links exist amongst member
institutes of the European VLBI Network, established in the course of 20 years
of joint observations. Electronic mail, World Wide Web, and FTP services are in
daily use. A great deal of experience in coordinating international projects
within the EVN has been obtained during the construction of the new 16-station
data processor at JIVE, and in the upgrade of the data acquisition systems at
each radio telescope to the MkIV standard.
The Hartebeesthoek Radio Astronomy Observatory in South
Africa will participate in this activity prior to joining the European VLBI
Network.
No sub-contracting is foreseen in the course of this
activity.
3.2
VLBI Schools, Symposia, and Users
Meetings
3.2.1
Work Plan
3.2.1.1 Main Tasks
|
Objectives |
Work to be done |
Partners |
|
EVN Symposia in
2000 and 2002, including General Users Meetings |
Organize the
Symposia and Users Meetings
(announcement, location, logistics, travel, scientific programme,
financial support, etc) |
All partners listed in Table 1,
section 1.1. Coordinators: Two
EVN institutes (to be selected), assisted by JIVE |
|
EVN VLBI Schools in
2001 and 2003 |
Organise the Schools (announcement,
location, logistics, programme, travel, financial support, etc) |
All partners listed in Table 1,
section 1.1. Coordinators: Two
EVN institutes (to be selected), assisted by JIVE |
The host institute and JIVE will each contribute 1 man-month
to the organization of each event, a total of 4 man-months for JIVE and 1
man-month for each of the 4 host institutes. The other institutes will each
contribute a total of 1 man-month of their permanent staff effort to the
preparation and delivery of lectures at the VLBI Schools.
The milestones and deliverables are shown in the chart at
the end of the Project Programme.
3.2.1.2 Objectives
a)
*
Via the VLBI Schools, to propagate
knowledge of radio interferometry and VLBI techniques widely throughout the
astronomical community in Europe.
*
Via the EVN Symposia, to provide a
forum in which the most recent VLBI results can be presented and young
astronomers can come in contact with their more established colleagues and
initiate trans-national collaborations.
*
Via the General Users Meetings, to
allow the EVN management to take note of, and react to, comments from the users
of the EVN on its operational efficiency and plans for future developments.
b) The coordination afforded by the Cooperation Network will
lead to greater awareness in the general astronomical community of the
opportunities offered by the Symposia and Schools.
c) The beneficiaries of this activity are the astronomical
community in general, including astronomers in the EVN institutes.
d) The Network policy with respect to this activity is that
each participating institute should take its turn in hosting a Symposium and/or
a School. This will enhance the local awareness of the EVN in the country
hosting the event.
e) The papers presented at the EVN Symposia will be refereed
and published in book form.
f) There are no obvious risks associated with this activity.
3.2.1.3 Potential benefits
Trans-national research collaboration in radio astronomy in
Europe will be stimulated by participation in the EVN Symposia. As a result of
the VLBI Schools, the user community in Europe will become more competent in
exploiting the VLBI technique and radio interferometry. Establishing a broader
base of competence in radio interferometry in Europe will also serve the long
term interests of the other two elements of the Radio Astronomy Programme, ALMA
and SKA, in building up the potential community for their use. In addition, the
training in radio astronomical image processing and analysis provides an
excellent basis for careers for young scientists in the information technology
branch of industry.
3.2.2
Organization
EVN VLBI Schools and EVN Symposia are held in alternate years. JIVE will carry out the organization
of these events in collaboration with the host institute. JIVE=s
role includes placing an announcement on the EVN and JIVE Web pages,
circulating the announcement on email exploders, and handling travel requests.
The host institute is responsible for the venue, organizing accommodation for
the participants, and the logistics during the event. JIVE and the host
institute are jointly responsible for the lecture and demonstration programme
for the Schools, the scientific programme for the Symposia, and for publication
of the Proceedings of the Symposia.
3.3
Coordination of scientific and technical input in the design and development
phase for the Atacama Large Millimetre Array (ALMA)
3.3.1
Work Plan
3.3.1.1 Main Tasks
|
Objectives |
Work to be done |
Partners |
|
Establish European
scientific and technical priorities
for the Atacama Large Millimetre Array |
1) Organise topical workshops 2) Write reports on the outcomes and
submit to ALMA Project Management 3) Present the
outcomes in international scientific and technical meetings |
Institutes listed in Table 2, section
1.1. Coordinator: MPIfR |
The partners in this activity are all well established
centres for millimetre-wave radio astronomy in Europe either operating
state-of-the-art national millimetre-wave radio telescopes or making major
technical contributions in this area (e.g. correlators). Each of the partners will contribute 4
man-months of their permanent staff effort during the two years of this
activity.
The milestones and deliverables are shown in the chart at
the end of the Project Programme.
3.3.1.2 Technical Objectives
a) The deliverables at the end of the cooperation will be a
set of reports that define the European perspective on the issues investigated
and provide the necessary scientific argumentation and technical background for
implementation in the project.
b) One of the objectives of this activity is to stimulate
the coordination of European expertise in millimetre-wave radio astronomy. The
Workshops will be the prime mechanism for accomplishing this.
c) The users of the results of the studies will be the ALMA
Project Management in the first instance. The Cooperation Network partners and
the participants in the Workshops will benefit from their direct involvement in
the decision making process on the scientific and technical profile of ALMA.
The general astronomical community will benefit from a well conceived array
design once it is built.
d) The Cooperation Network believes that it is essential
that the European radio astronomy community coordinate its scientific and
technical participation and support for ALMA. The Workshops and reports are
designed to help accomplish this policy.
e) European scientists and engineers will present the
results of these studies at international scientific meetings such as the
General Assemblies of the International Astronomical Union (IAU) and the
International Union of Radio Science (URSI). In appropriate cases, papers will
be written for publication in refereed astronomical and engineering journals.
f) There are no obvious risks which would hinder exploitation
of the results.
3.3.1.3 Potential benefits
The ALMA project as a whole can be expected to benefit from
the activity proposed. The proposed studies will help define the specific roles
of the partners in the further development of the project.
The ALMA project provides no opportunity to establish a
distributed infrastructure.
3.3.2 Organization
The Coordinator of this activity, the Max-Planck-Institute
for Radioastronomy which is providing the chairmanship of the European ALMA
Scientific Advisory Committee, will take the initiative to organize the topical
workshops to be held in the participating institutes in turn. This will be done
in collaboration with the host institute for each Workshop. Participation in
the Workshops will be by invitation alone, with the aim of bringing together
the experts on the subject of the Workshop. Work packages may result from a
Workshop involving research at one or more of the institutes to clarify
technical or scientific requirements. The results of this research will also be
included in the report from each Workshop going to the ALMA Project Management.
No sub-contracting is foreseen.
The US partners in ALMA have expressed interest in the
results of this activity, and will be kept informed by the Coordinator.
Potential Canadian partners in ALMA have also expressed interest in the results
of this activity, and will be kept informed by the Coordinator.
3.4
Mapping study for the Square Kilometre Array (SKA)
3.4.1
Work Plan
3.4.1.1 Main Tasks
|
Objective |
Work to be done |
Partners |
|
Define the
technical requirements and organizational strategy for the Square Kilometre
Array |
1) agree the procedures to be
followed during the activity 2) organize workshops to evaluate the
competing technologies for the SKA 2) select the best technical concept 3) agree on the strategy for
implementing the concept 4) write a document
on the technical requirements and organizational strategy |
See Table 3 in section 1.1 Coordinator: NFRA |
The partners involved all operate state-of-the-art national
radio telescopes working at centimetre to metre wavelengths, and represent much
of the world=s
expertise in radio astronomy technology at these wavelengths. They will each
contribute at least 4 man-months in technological research effort in support of
the decision-making process.
The milestones and deliverables are shown on the
accompanying chart at the end of the Project Programme.
3.4.1.2 Objectives
a) The main objective is to map out the collaborations
leading to a formal proposal for the Square Kilometre Array. This is foreseen
to be a global endeavour with a leading role for Europe. The main deliverable
at the end of the contract will be a document which outlines the scientific
case for the SKA, the technical concepts to be employed, plans for prototyping
critical elements, a proposal for managing the project including the division
of responsibility amongst the partners, and a strategy for seeking funding for
the project. This document will form the basis of formal proposals to the
appropriate authorities in the participating regions of the world.
b) By setting out a timeline for reaching a consensus, the
Cooperation Network will help focus attention on the specific technological and
organizational questions that need to be answered, and so perform a crucial
role in coordinating activities around the world. It will identify
opportunities for collaborative technical development, especially with European
industry. This is especially valuable because there is no international organization
like CERN or ESO for radio astronomy.
c) The users of the results will be the partners in the
Network representing the radio astronomy community around the world.
d) The Network policy on coordination and complementarity
for this future major research infrastructure will be established during the
course of this activity.
e) The results of the work done in the course of this
activity will be presented at international scientific meetings such as the
General Assemblies of the International Astronomical Union (IAU) and the
International Union of Radio Science (URSI). This will inform the astronomical
community at large of progress in preparations for this facility, and at the
same time provide an opportunity for astronomers and engineers not directly
involved in the project to comment on the directions being followed.
f) There are risks involved in achieving the necessary
consensus in the 4 years of the cooperation proposed here. However, there are
no obvious risks which may hinder exploitation of the outcome of this activity
once available.
3.4.1.3 Potential benefits
SKA is an ambitious project, but one necessary to maintain
the momentum of discovery in this wavelength region. All partners will benefit
from the expected result of a well-defined technical and organizational
strategy for this project.
The distribution of the total collecting area of the SKA
will be one of the issues studied in the course of this activity. It is
essential to optimize this configuration for the key science objectives, and an
early goal of this activity will be to define these objectives. One possible
array configuration involves placing segments of the array at separations of
hundreds to thousands of km from the central concentration in order to achieve
high angular resolution in VLBI mode. These segments would be maintained
locally and operated as part of the SKA and occasionally as a standalone
telescope when the SKA observing programme allows. This then would be a
distributed infrastructure similar to the European VLBI Network.
3.4.2
Organisation
At the start of the contract period, the Coordinator of this
activity, the Netherlands Foundation for Research in Astronomy (NFRA), will
call a meeting of the Directors of the participating institutes in order to set
the agenda for the studies to follow, and agree on the steps leading to a
consensus. This will involve organizing
workshops on the competing technologies for the SKA. This will be done in
collaboration with the host institute for each Workshop. Participation in the
Workshops will be by invitation alone, with the aim of bringing together the
experts on the subject of the Workshop. Work packages may result from a
Workshop involving research at one or more of the institutes to clarify
technical or scientific requirements. The selection of the best technical
concept will be made by the Directors of the participating institutes who will
then take the responsibility for generating the appropriate document.
No sub-contracting is foreseen as part of this activity.
The Australian and Canadian partners in the Network
represent local consortia in those countries, and they will integrate the
interests of their local consortia in their responses to strategic issues. The
US Consortium will also interact with the Network partners in a similar way.